Who was better Rolling Stones or Beatles?

Who was better Rolling Stones or Beatles?

While the Beatles maintained the shorter career span, the Rolling Stones were certainly the more prolific of the two bands. Some of the Rolling Stones best-known albums, including Sticky Fingers, Exile on Main Street, Goat's Head Soup, Some Girls, and Tattoo You all came out after the Beatles broke up.

What are the key differences between the Beatles and the Rolling Stones?

The difference between The Beatles and the Rolling Stones isn't just that The Beatles have a capital letter 'T' to their name and the Rolling Stones don't. It's more to do with the difference, say, between dope and speed. One – dope – is thinking it music; the other – speed – is doing it music.

What did the Rolling Stones think of the Beatles?

In a 2011 interview with the Radio Times, McCartney asserted that the Stones were jealous of the Beatles' vocal abilities: “I talked to Keith Richards a couple of years ago, and his take on it was: 'Man, you were lucky, you guys, you had four lead singers,' whereas The Rolling Stones only had one,” he said.

Who sold more records the Rolling Stones or the Beatles?

	ARTIST	COMBINED SALES TOTAL
1	BEATLES	22.1 MILLION
2	QUEEN	12.8 MILLION
3	ABBA	11.3 MILLION
4	ROLLING STONES	10.1 MILLION

Who is the best rock band ever?

The 10 best rock bands ever

1. The Beatles. The Beatles are unquestionably the best and most important band in rock history, as well as the most compelling story. ...
2. The Rolling Stones. ...
3. U2. ...
4. The Grateful Dead. ...
5. Velvet Underground. ...
6. Led Zeppelin. ...
7. Ramones. ...
8. Pink Floyd.

Are paul McCartney and Mick Jagger friends?

Despite exchanging shady words with each other, McCartney previously said they had a rivalry during their early years and "a little bit of friction," but they always ended up being friends.

Was Queen more popular than the Beatles?

They have 27 no. 1 singles in just 8 years, beat the world record of domination of the top charts and hold it since, and of course, invented a lot of stuff, like the simble of Rock and Roll. Queen has some 8 Major hits, but Beatles are the most famous, hands down.

Did the Beatles meet The Rolling Stones?

It was 57 years ago Sunday (April 14th, 1963) that the Beatles and the Rolling Stones first met. The Beatles, who were new on the scene in London, had heard about the group through word of mouth, and were in the audience at the Stones' show in Richmond at the Crawdaddy Club at the Station Hotel.

Did paul McCartney insult The Rolling Stones?

McCartney called The Rolling Stones a "cover band" in a new interview. Speaking to The New Yorker writer David Remnick, McCartney was clear about who he thinks is the more artistically adventurous band. ... That's sort of what the Stones are," he said. "I think our net was cast a bit wider than theirs."

Who is the #1 selling artist of all time?

The Beatles 1. The Beatles — 183 million units.

Were the Rolling Stones better than the Beatles?

• The Beatles Are Better Than The Rolling Stones. They were innovators where the Stones were practitioners. The Stones covered Chuck Berry, but so did the Beatles ... a couple of years earlier. The Stones perfected the art of the rock 'n' roll single in the mid '60s, just as the Beatles did several months before.

Who came first, the Beatles or the Rolling Stones?

• Who came out first the beatles or the rolling stones. kgb answers » Arts & Entertainment » Music Artists & Songs » Who came out first the beatles or the rolling stones. The Beatles began in 1957 (but then they were called the Quarry Men ).

Are the Beatles considered rock'n'roll?

• The Beatles are one of the most innovative rock bands of all time. They have not only changed the way rock and roll is looked at, but also the way that the music is recorded. They have influenced the artists of the 60s and the 70s, and also many generations later and to come.

What is the Rolling Stones longest song?

• Memory Motel. The song is credited to singer Mick Jagger and guitarist Keith Richards (named Richard at the time). It is one of the few which feature both members sharing lead vocals. The song itself is over seven minutes long, one of the longest songs by the Rolling Stones.